<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Building Browsergames - Latest Comments in Why you should be hashing sensitive data</title><link>http://bbgames.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://bbgames.disqus.com/why_you_should_be_hashing_sensitive_data/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 05:33:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why you should be hashing sensitive data</title><link>http://buildingbrowsergames.com/2008/04/21/why-you-should-be-hashing-sensitive-data/#comment-706859847</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I know you mean well but it's irresponsible to mention hashing without going into salting and chaining; anything hashed with a single iteration of a hashing algorithm will last (less than) seconds against a rainbow table.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom McAtee</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 05:33:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why you should be hashing sensitive data</title><link>http://buildingbrowsergames.com/2008/04/21/why-you-should-be-hashing-sensitive-data/#comment-261216649</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Got that. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Benjamin Vangeel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:20:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why you should be hashing sensitive data</title><link>http://buildingbrowsergames.com/2008/04/21/why-you-should-be-hashing-sensitive-data/#comment-259078621</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You only hash the stuff that you don't want to show in the future, but want to compare with user input. Passwords are pretty much the only thing, so no.&lt;br&gt;Do not hash everything else.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luke Bullard</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:08:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why you should be hashing sensitive data</title><link>http://buildingbrowsergames.com/2008/04/21/why-you-should-be-hashing-sensitive-data/#comment-238091305</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So I need to add the hashing command after everything else in my register.php file?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">benjamin_vangeel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:22:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why you should be hashing sensitive data</title><link>http://buildingbrowsergames.com/2008/04/21/why-you-should-be-hashing-sensitive-data/#comment-24058825</link><description>&lt;p&gt;E-mails are definitely considered sensitive(although you can't hash them&lt;br&gt;because you need them to e-mail users).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I shouldn't say that there's no way to unhash data, but there's no way that&lt;br&gt;you'd want to - if you want to be able to recover the information, you&lt;br&gt;should look at encrypting it instead(so that you can decrypt it when you&lt;br&gt;need it).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luke</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:30:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why you should be hashing sensitive data</title><link>http://buildingbrowsergames.com/2008/04/21/why-you-should-be-hashing-sensitive-data/#comment-24037628</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is emails considered sensitive in this matter? And is there no way to unhash data that is hashed?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marius</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:37:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>